500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

QUEENSBURY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

343
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 664

LEVEL 1

118

18%

LEVEL 2

203

31%

LEVEL 3

197

30%

LEVEL 4

146

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

351
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

84

14%

LEVEL 2

163

27%

LEVEL 3

193

32%

LEVEL 4

158

26%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

189
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

37

12%

LEVEL 2

93

29%

LEVEL 3

105

33%

LEVEL 4

84

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

194
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

73

25%

LEVEL 3

100

34%

LEVEL 4

94

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

154
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

81

23%

LEVEL 2

110

32%

LEVEL 3

92

27%

LEVEL 4

62

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

157
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

61

20%

LEVEL 2

90

29%

LEVEL 3

93

30%

LEVEL 4

64

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

323
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 626

LEVEL 1

111

18%

LEVEL 2

192

31%

LEVEL 3

184

29%

LEVEL 4

139

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

332
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

78

14%

LEVEL 2

153

27%

LEVEL 3

183

33%

LEVEL 4

149

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

340
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 585

LEVEL 1

57

10%

LEVEL 2

188

32%

LEVEL 3

194

33%

LEVEL 4

146

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

346
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

40

8%

LEVEL 2

140

27%

LEVEL 3

189

36%

LEVEL 4

157

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

61

77%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

44

61%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

304
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

61

12%

LEVEL 2

125

26%

LEVEL 3

171

35%

LEVEL 4

133

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

300
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

42

10%

LEVEL 2

100

23%

LEVEL 3

156

35%

LEVEL 4

144

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

57

33%

LEVEL 2

78

45%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

42

27%

LEVEL 2

63

40%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.