500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PALMYRA-MACEDON INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

118

30%

LEVEL 2

124

32%

LEVEL 3

111

28%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

140

36%

LEVEL 2

116

30%

LEVEL 3

95

25%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

67

34%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

67

36%

LEVEL 2

54

29%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

51

26%

LEVEL 2

58

30%

LEVEL 3

64

33%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

73

37%

LEVEL 2

62

31%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

140
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

103

29%

LEVEL 2

110

31%

LEVEL 3

102

29%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

123

35%

LEVEL 2

105

30%

LEVEL 3

89

25%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

82

24%

LEVEL 2

116

34%

LEVEL 3

110

32%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

106

31%

LEVEL 2

105

31%

LEVEL 3

92

27%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

36

78%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

34

71%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

44

20%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

78

35%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

57

26%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

74

43%

LEVEL 2

56

33%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

83

49%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.