500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PALMYRA-MACEDON INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

135

33%

LEVEL 2

153

38%

LEVEL 3

91

22%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

86

22%

LEVEL 2

160

40%

LEVEL 3

106

27%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

58

31%

LEVEL 2

68

37%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

34

19%

LEVEL 2

81

46%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

77

35%

LEVEL 2

85

39%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

52

24%

LEVEL 2

79

36%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

125

34%

LEVEL 2

135

36%

LEVEL 3

87

23%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

141
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

74

20%

LEVEL 2

146

40%

LEVEL 3

98

27%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

91

26%

LEVEL 2

143

41%

LEVEL 3

90

26%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

55

15%

LEVEL 2

151

43%

LEVEL 3

103

29%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

44

79%

LEVEL 2

10

18%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

31

72%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

66

27%

LEVEL 2

93

38%

LEVEL 3

66

27%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

94

39%

LEVEL 3

80

33%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

69

44%

LEVEL 2

60

38%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

57

36%

LEVEL 2

66

42%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.