500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

NORTH ROSE-WOLCOTT MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

138

38%

LEVEL 2

163

44%

LEVEL 3

58

16%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

136

42%

LEVEL 2

125

38%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

67

32%

LEVEL 2

102

48%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

73

40%

LEVEL 2

69

38%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

71

46%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

19

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

63

44%

LEVEL 2

56

39%

LEVEL 3

20

14%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

122

37%

LEVEL 2

144

44%

LEVEL 3

56

17%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

115

40%

LEVEL 2

112

39%

LEVEL 3

50

17%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

11

50%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

12

50%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

97

30%

LEVEL 2

160

50%

LEVEL 3

58

18%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

103

36%

LEVEL 2

120

42%

LEVEL 3

55

19%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

41

93%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

33

87%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

30

23%

LEVEL 2

62

47%

LEVEL 3

36

27%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

34

29%

LEVEL 2

39

34%

LEVEL 3

34

29%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

108

46%

LEVEL 2

101

43%

LEVEL 3

22

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

102

48%

LEVEL 2

86

41%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

66
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

135

37%

LEVEL 2

160

44%

LEVEL 3

58

16%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

64
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

133

41%

LEVEL 2

124

39%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.