500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PIERRE VAN CORTLANDT SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

276
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

50

10%

LEVEL 2

181

36%

LEVEL 3

160

32%

LEVEL 4

116

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

51

13%

LEVEL 2

122

32%

LEVEL 3

124

32%

LEVEL 4

89

23%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

170
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

86

31%

LEVEL 3

93

34%

LEVEL 4

77

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

72

34%

LEVEL 4

63

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

95

41%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

39

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

37

22%

LEVEL 2

57

33%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

10

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

9

33%

LEVEL 4

12

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

229
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

30

8%

LEVEL 2

139

35%

LEVEL 3

136

34%

LEVEL 4

93

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

158
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

92

34%

LEVEL 4

66

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

5

28%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

13

22%

LEVEL 2

31

52%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

22

34%

LEVEL 2

22

34%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

271
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

26

6%

LEVEL 2

148

33%

LEVEL 3

156

35%

LEVEL 4

115

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

105

31%

LEVEL 3

119

35%

LEVEL 4

89

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

24

39%

LEVEL 2

33

53%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

26

54%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

276
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

47

9%

LEVEL 2

178

36%

LEVEL 3

160

32%

LEVEL 4

116

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

213
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

43

11%

LEVEL 2

121

32%

LEVEL 3

124

33%

LEVEL 4

89

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

8

89%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

207
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

36

10%

LEVEL 2

105

30%

LEVEL 3

120

34%

LEVEL 4

87

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

15

39%

LEVEL 2

17

45%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.