500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CARRIE E TOMPKINS SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

35

14%

LEVEL 3

93

38%

LEVEL 4

91

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

41

18%

LEVEL 3

96

43%

LEVEL 4

70

31%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

15

13%

LEVEL 3

51

44%

LEVEL 4

43

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

18

18%

LEVEL 3

50

49%

LEVEL 4

28

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

20

16%

LEVEL 3

42

34%

LEVEL 4

48

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

46

38%

LEVEL 4

42

35%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

9

47%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

11

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

135
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

23

14%

LEVEL 3

68

41%

LEVEL 4

67

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

30

19%

LEVEL 3

75

47%

LEVEL 4

48

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

15

35%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

8

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

8

26%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

29

14%

LEVEL 3

87

41%

LEVEL 4

87

41%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

27

14%

LEVEL 3

90

47%

LEVEL 4

66

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

12

43%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

9

27%

LEVEL 2

14

42%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

182
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

32

14%

LEVEL 3

91

39%

LEVEL 4

91

39%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

163
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

40

18%

LEVEL 3

93

43%

LEVEL 4

70

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

28

13%

LEVEL 3

89

40%

LEVEL 4

91

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

162
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

33

16%

LEVEL 3

93

45%

LEVEL 4

69

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

10

48%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.