500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MURRAY AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

58

17%

LEVEL 3

132

38%

LEVEL 4

140

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

296
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

51

14%

LEVEL 3

133

37%

LEVEL 4

163

45%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

143
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

31

17%

LEVEL 3

76

42%

LEVEL 4

67

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

149
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

25

14%

LEVEL 3

69

38%

LEVEL 4

80

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

27

16%

LEVEL 3

56

34%

LEVEL 4

73

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

147
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

26

14%

LEVEL 3

64

35%

LEVEL 4

83

46%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

13

59%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

9

47%

LEVEL 4

7

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

230
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

48

16%

LEVEL 3

115

39%

LEVEL 4

115

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

250
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

43

14%

LEVEL 3

112

37%

LEVEL 4

138

45%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

6

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

6

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

49

15%

LEVEL 3

125

39%

LEVEL 4

139

43%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

289
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

45

13%

LEVEL 3

127

37%

LEVEL 4

162

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

11

39%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

271
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

56

16%

LEVEL 3

132

39%

LEVEL 4

139

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.