500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PLEASANTVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

343
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

51

10%

LEVEL 2

131

25%

LEVEL 3

190

36%

LEVEL 4

153

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

104

25%

LEVEL 3

145

35%

LEVEL 4

146

35%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

150
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

61

26%

LEVEL 3

92

39%

LEVEL 4

58

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

147
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

58

27%

LEVEL 3

79

37%

LEVEL 4

68

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

193
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

70

24%

LEVEL 3

98

34%

LEVEL 4

95

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

144
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

46

23%

LEVEL 3

66

33%

LEVEL 4

78

38%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

26

72%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

13

42%

LEVEL 4

15

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

291
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

40

9%

LEVEL 2

111

25%

LEVEL 3

166

38%

LEVEL 4

125

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

251
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

81

23%

LEVEL 3

123

35%

LEVEL 4

128

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

15

41%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

16

53%

LEVEL 3

9

30%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

331
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

18

4%

LEVEL 2

100

22%

LEVEL 3

179

40%

LEVEL 4

152

34%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

77

21%

LEVEL 3

140

38%

LEVEL 4

145

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

33

43%

LEVEL 2

31

41%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

16

33%

LEVEL 2

27

55%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

343
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

49

9%

LEVEL 2

128

25%

LEVEL 3

190

37%

LEVEL 4

153

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

329
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

40

8%

LEVEL 2

124

25%

LEVEL 3

176

36%

LEVEL 4

153

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

281
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

87

23%

LEVEL 3

136

35%

LEVEL 4

145

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

14

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

17

55%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.