500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PLEASANTVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

336
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

40

7%

LEVEL 2

159

30%

LEVEL 3

181

34%

LEVEL 4

155

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

46

11%

LEVEL 2

157

37%

LEVEL 3

156

37%

LEVEL 4

63

15%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

165
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

66

27%

LEVEL 3

89

37%

LEVEL 4

76

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

85

40%

LEVEL 4

42

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

171
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

92

31%

LEVEL 4

79

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

71

34%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

17

47%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

14

47%

LEVEL 4

6

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

285
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

135

30%

LEVEL 3

149

33%

LEVEL 4

136

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

190
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

131

37%

LEVEL 3

134

38%

LEVEL 4

56

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

15

38%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

10

32%

LEVEL 2

14

45%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

325
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

120

26%

LEVEL 3

174

38%

LEVEL 4

151

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

134

36%

LEVEL 3

154

42%

LEVEL 4

62

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

28

36%

LEVEL 2

39

50%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

27

51%

LEVEL 2

23

43%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

336
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

37

7%

LEVEL 2

157

30%

LEVEL 3

181

34%

LEVEL 4

155

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

325
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

32

6%

LEVEL 2

143

29%

LEVEL 3

172

34%

LEVEL 4

153

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

214
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

40

10%

LEVEL 2

137

35%

LEVEL 3

151

39%

LEVEL 4

63

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

16

46%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

20

65%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.