500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

BYRAM HILLS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

573
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 771

LEVEL 1

43

6%

LEVEL 2

155

20%

LEVEL 3

230

30%

LEVEL 4

343

44%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

608
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 822

LEVEL 1

54

7%

LEVEL 2

160

19%

LEVEL 3

271

33%

LEVEL 4

337

41%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

278
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

87

23%

LEVEL 3

132

34%

LEVEL 4

146

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

296
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

86

21%

LEVEL 3

146

35%

LEVEL 4

150

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

295
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

68

18%

LEVEL 3

98

25%

LEVEL 4

197

51%

MALE

PROFICIENT

312
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

74

18%

LEVEL 3

125

31%

LEVEL 4

187

46%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

47
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

36

68%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

52
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

15

24%

LEVEL 4

37

59%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

491
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 660

LEVEL 1

36

5%

LEVEL 2

133

20%

LEVEL 3

202

31%

LEVEL 4

289

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

504
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 686

LEVEL 1

43

6%

LEVEL 2

139

20%

LEVEL 3

233

34%

LEVEL 4

271

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

15

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

23

45%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

554
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 683

LEVEL 1

11

2%

LEVEL 2

118

17%

LEVEL 3

217

32%

LEVEL 4

337

49%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

582
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 711

LEVEL 1

18

3%

LEVEL 2

111

16%

LEVEL 3

253

36%

LEVEL 4

329

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

32

36%

LEVEL 2

37

42%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

36

32%

LEVEL 2

49

44%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

557
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 748

LEVEL 1

38

5%

LEVEL 2

153

20%

LEVEL 3

219

29%

LEVEL 4

338

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

589
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 793

LEVEL 1

49

6%

LEVEL 2

155

20%

LEVEL 3

262

33%

LEVEL 4

327

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

11

48%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

9

31%

LEVEL 4

10

34%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.