500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

BYRAM HILLS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

743
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 979

LEVEL 1

51

5%

LEVEL 2

185

19%

LEVEL 3

417

43%

LEVEL 4

326

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

743
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 986

LEVEL 1

42

4%

LEVEL 2

201

20%

LEVEL 3

396

40%

LEVEL 4

347

35%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

387
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

22

5%

LEVEL 2

77

16%

LEVEL 3

220

45%

LEVEL 4

167

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

376
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

19

4%

LEVEL 2

84

18%

LEVEL 3

181

38%

LEVEL 4

195

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

356
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

29

6%

LEVEL 2

108

22%

LEVEL 3

197

40%

LEVEL 4

159

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

367
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

23

5%

LEVEL 2

117

23%

LEVEL 3

215

42%

LEVEL 4

152

30%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

14

54%

LEVEL 4

7

27%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

26
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

11

32%

LEVEL 4

15

44%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

66
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

37

49%

LEVEL 4

29

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

74
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

29

36%

LEVEL 4

45

56%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

604
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 807

LEVEL 1

46

6%

LEVEL 2

157

19%

LEVEL 3

340

42%

LEVEL 4

264

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

593
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 801

LEVEL 1

32

4%

LEVEL 2

176

22%

LEVEL 3

332

41%

LEVEL 4

261

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

23

35%

LEVEL 4

25

38%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

22

34%

LEVEL 4

22

34%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

720
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 855

LEVEL 1

11

1%

LEVEL 2

124

15%

LEVEL 3

398

47%

LEVEL 4

322

38%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

711
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 873

LEVEL 1

12

1%

LEVEL 2

150

17%

LEVEL 3

367

42%

LEVEL 4

344

39%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

40

32%

LEVEL 2

61

49%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

32
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

30

27%

LEVEL 2

51

45%

LEVEL 3

29

26%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

719
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 935

LEVEL 1

47

5%

LEVEL 2

169

18%

LEVEL 3

400

43%

LEVEL 4

319

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

715
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 938

LEVEL 1

36

4%

LEVEL 2

187

20%

LEVEL 3

381

41%

LEVEL 4

334

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

17

39%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

13

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

740
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 981

LEVEL 1

41

4%

LEVEL 2

200

20%

LEVEL 3

395

40%

LEVEL 4

345

35%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.