500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PORT CHESTER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 737

LEVEL 1

343

47%

LEVEL 2

218

30%

LEVEL 3

129

18%

LEVEL 4

47

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 704

LEVEL 1

288

41%

LEVEL 2

237

34%

LEVEL 3

128

18%

LEVEL 4

51

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

140

42%

LEVEL 2

122

36%

LEVEL 3

55

16%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

129

39%

LEVEL 2

116

35%

LEVEL 3

65

20%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

203

50%

LEVEL 2

96

24%

LEVEL 3

74

18%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

159

43%

LEVEL 2

121

32%

LEVEL 3

63

17%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

35

37%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

20

21%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

26

31%

LEVEL 2

24

29%

LEVEL 3

22

27%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

12

57%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

132
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 608

LEVEL 1

297

49%

LEVEL 2

179

29%

LEVEL 3

100

16%

LEVEL 4

32

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

135
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 582

LEVEL 1

245

42%

LEVEL 2

202

35%

LEVEL 3

99

17%

LEVEL 4

36

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 680

LEVEL 1

297

44%

LEVEL 2

210

31%

LEVEL 3

126

19%

LEVEL 4

47

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

226

36%

LEVEL 2

227

36%

LEVEL 3

124

20%

LEVEL 4

51

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

46

81%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

62

82%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

165
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

189

35%

LEVEL 2

189

35%

LEVEL 3

120

22%

LEVEL 4

45

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

173
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

153

30%

LEVEL 2

188

37%

LEVEL 3

122

24%

LEVEL 4

51

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

154

79%

LEVEL 2

29

15%

LEVEL 3

9

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

135

71%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

62

37%

LEVEL 2

53

31%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

34

22%

LEVEL 2

61

40%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

281

49%

LEVEL 2

165

29%

LEVEL 3

95

17%

LEVEL 4

27

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

254

46%

LEVEL 2

176

32%

LEVEL 3

87

16%

LEVEL 4

33

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

175
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 727

LEVEL 1

336

46%

LEVEL 2

216

30%

LEVEL 3

129

18%

LEVEL 4

46

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

178
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 697

LEVEL 1

284

41%

LEVEL 2

235

34%

LEVEL 3

127

18%

LEVEL 4

51

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.