500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PORT CHESTER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

315
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 785

LEVEL 1

219

28%

LEVEL 2

251

32%

LEVEL 3

205

26%

LEVEL 4

110

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 743

LEVEL 1

227

31%

LEVEL 2

244

33%

LEVEL 3

184

25%

LEVEL 4

88

12%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

182
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

78

21%

LEVEL 2

114

30%

LEVEL 3

118

32%

LEVEL 4

64

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

160
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

84

23%

LEVEL 2

114

32%

LEVEL 3

105

29%

LEVEL 4

55

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

141

34%

LEVEL 2

137

33%

LEVEL 3

87

21%

LEVEL 4

46

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

143

37%

LEVEL 2

130

34%

LEVEL 3

79

21%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

26

25%

LEVEL 2

27

26%

LEVEL 3

32

31%

LEVEL 4

18

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

22

23%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

28

29%

LEVEL 4

19

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

14

54%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

247
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

181

28%

LEVEL 2

214

33%

LEVEL 3

164

26%

LEVEL 4

83

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

204
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 602

LEVEL 1

190

32%

LEVEL 2

208

35%

LEVEL 3

144

24%

LEVEL 4

60

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

308
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 714

LEVEL 1

168

24%

LEVEL 2

238

33%

LEVEL 3

198

28%

LEVEL 4

110

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

269
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 661

LEVEL 1

170

26%

LEVEL 2

222

34%

LEVEL 3

181

27%

LEVEL 4

88

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

51

72%

LEVEL 2

13

18%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

57

70%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

297
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 594

LEVEL 1

94

16%

LEVEL 2

203

34%

LEVEL 3

190

32%

LEVEL 4

107

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

264
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

99

18%

LEVEL 2

193

35%

LEVEL 3

176

32%

LEVEL 4

88

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

18
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

125

65%

LEVEL 2

48

25%

LEVEL 3

15

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

128

68%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

8

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

46

26%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

39

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

30

18%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

51

30%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

230
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

173

28%

LEVEL 2

208

34%

LEVEL 3

159

26%

LEVEL 4

71

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

192
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

197

34%

LEVEL 2

186

32%

LEVEL 3

133

23%

LEVEL 4

59

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

314
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 772

LEVEL 1

210

27%

LEVEL 2

248

32%

LEVEL 3

204

26%

LEVEL 4

110

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

271
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 736

LEVEL 1

224

30%

LEVEL 2

241

33%

LEVEL 3

184

25%

LEVEL 4

87

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.