500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PATRICIA A DICHIARO SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

52

16%

LEVEL 2

114

34%

LEVEL 3

110

33%

LEVEL 4

56

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

104

31%

LEVEL 3

128

39%

LEVEL 4

75

23%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

55

34%

LEVEL 3

54

33%

LEVEL 4

36

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

67

40%

LEVEL 4

43

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

34

20%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

56

33%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

57

35%

LEVEL 3

61

37%

LEVEL 4

32

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

5

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

25

13%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

65

34%

LEVEL 4

32

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

68

39%

LEVEL 4

43

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

56%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

21

21%

LEVEL 2

31

31%

LEVEL 3

31

31%

LEVEL 4

18

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

39

35%

LEVEL 3

43

38%

LEVEL 4

21

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

81

33%

LEVEL 3

92

37%

LEVEL 4

55

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

96

38%

LEVEL 4

69

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

33

39%

LEVEL 2

33

39%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

38
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

34

43%

LEVEL 3

32

41%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

200
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

102

31%

LEVEL 3

125

38%

LEVEL 4

75

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

72

37%

LEVEL 4

38

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

84

41%

LEVEL 4

51

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

31

22%

LEVEL 2

51

37%

LEVEL 3

38

28%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

45

35%

LEVEL 3

44

34%

LEVEL 4

24

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.