500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CROSS HILL ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

164

48%

LEVEL 2

112

33%

LEVEL 3

55

16%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

164

45%

LEVEL 2

124

34%

LEVEL 3

67

18%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

67

40%

LEVEL 2

65

39%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

72

41%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

97

55%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

92

49%

LEVEL 2

57

30%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

9

33%

LEVEL 2

13

48%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

59

47%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

53

45%

LEVEL 2

38

32%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

93

51%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

26

14%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

94

48%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

89

34%

LEVEL 2

105

41%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

87

32%

LEVEL 2

111

41%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

75

89%

LEVEL 2

7

8%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

77

81%

LEVEL 2

13

14%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

65
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

145

46%

LEVEL 2

108

34%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

75
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

146

43%

LEVEL 2

119

35%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

19

79%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

18

72%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

16

30%

LEVEL 2

20

37%

LEVEL 3

15

28%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

21

30%

LEVEL 2

25

36%

LEVEL 3

18

26%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

148

51%

LEVEL 2

92

32%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

143

48%

LEVEL 2

99

33%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

65
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

155

47%

LEVEL 2

107

33%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

76
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

159

45%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

66

19%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.