500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PAIDEIA SCHOOL 15 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

137

39%

LEVEL 2

132

37%

LEVEL 3

72

20%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

96

27%

LEVEL 2

138

39%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

45

28%

LEVEL 2

65

40%

LEVEL 3

43

27%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

40

25%

LEVEL 2

55

34%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

92

48%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

56

29%

LEVEL 2

83

43%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

67

32%

LEVEL 2

80

39%

LEVEL 3

48

23%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

40

21%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

16

73%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

46

44%

LEVEL 2

42

40%

LEVEL 3

16

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

40

34%

LEVEL 2

45

38%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

45

20%

LEVEL 2

99

45%

LEVEL 3

65

29%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

34

15%

LEVEL 2

93

41%

LEVEL 3

69

30%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

92

70%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

62

49%

LEVEL 2

45

35%

LEVEL 3

18

14%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

84
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

126

38%

LEVEL 2

124

37%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

119
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

88

26%

LEVEL 2

133

39%

LEVEL 3

85

25%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

64

32%

LEVEL 2

74

37%

LEVEL 3

52

26%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

42

20%

LEVEL 2

83

39%

LEVEL 3

63

29%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

73

48%

LEVEL 2

58

38%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

54

39%

LEVEL 2

55

39%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.