500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL 22 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

103

42%

LEVEL 2

99

40%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

86

39%

LEVEL 2

90

40%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

47

36%

LEVEL 2

54

41%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

36

31%

LEVEL 2

51

44%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

56

49%

LEVEL 2

45

39%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

50

46%

LEVEL 2

39

36%

LEVEL 3

16

15%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

15
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

12

25%

LEVEL 2

21

44%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

14
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

16

44%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

23

43%

LEVEL 2

25

47%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

20

44%

LEVEL 2

14

31%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

67

50%

LEVEL 2

46

35%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

57

44%

LEVEL 2

56

43%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

83

37%

LEVEL 2

98

44%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

64

32%

LEVEL 2

87

44%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

20

95%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

22

88%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

44
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

88

38%

LEVEL 2

97

42%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

47
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

72

35%

LEVEL 2

89

43%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

15

88%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

14

93%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

34

34%

LEVEL 2

46

46%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

21

30%

LEVEL 2

31

44%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

69

47%

LEVEL 2

53

36%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

65

43%

LEVEL 2

59

39%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.