500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CESAR E CHAVEZ SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

203

51%

LEVEL 2

119

30%

LEVEL 3

54

14%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

173

47%

LEVEL 2

89

24%

LEVEL 3

82

22%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

100

50%

LEVEL 2

68

34%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

81

43%

LEVEL 2

54

29%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

103

53%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

92

50%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

42

23%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

45

69%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

37

60%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

143

47%

LEVEL 2

104

34%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

83
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

123

44%

LEVEL 2

75

27%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

142

46%

LEVEL 2

99

32%

LEVEL 3

48

16%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

121

41%

LEVEL 2

77

26%

LEVEL 3

74

25%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

61

69%

LEVEL 2

20

23%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

52

71%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

73
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

160

46%

LEVEL 2

112

32%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

107
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

139

43%

LEVEL 2

80

25%

LEVEL 3

80

25%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

43

86%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

34

76%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

28

43%

LEVEL 2

26

40%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

22

37%

LEVEL 2

21

35%

LEVEL 3

14

23%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

175

53%

LEVEL 2

93

28%

LEVEL 3

44

13%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

151

49%

LEVEL 2

68

22%

LEVEL 3

68

22%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

71
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

200

51%

LEVEL 2

119

31%

LEVEL 3

53

14%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

108
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

168

46%

LEVEL 2

89

24%

LEVEL 3

81

22%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.