500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

LINCOLN TITUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

32

15%

LEVEL 2

58

27%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

59

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

32

21%

LEVEL 3

56

36%

LEVEL 4

55

35%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

11

11%

LEVEL 2

27

27%

LEVEL 3

34

34%

LEVEL 4

28

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

30

42%

LEVEL 4

23

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

21

18%

LEVEL 2

31

27%

LEVEL 3

31

27%

LEVEL 4

31

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

20

24%

LEVEL 3

26

31%

LEVEL 4

32

38%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

5

71%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

41

26%

LEVEL 3

52

33%

LEVEL 4

47

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

78
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

21

21%

LEVEL 3

38

37%

LEVEL 4

40

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

10

31%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

10

34%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

47

25%

LEVEL 3

62

33%

LEVEL 4

58

31%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

27

18%

LEVEL 3

55

38%

LEVEL 4

55

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

11

42%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

60

32%

LEVEL 4

56

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

28

20%

LEVEL 3

51

36%

LEVEL 4

54

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.