500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CROMPOND SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

50

15%

LEVEL 2

87

27%

LEVEL 3

114

35%

LEVEL 4

76

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

101

28%

LEVEL 3

124

35%

LEVEL 4

96

27%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

20

12%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

60

37%

LEVEL 4

31

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

59

34%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

46

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

30

18%

LEVEL 2

34

21%

LEVEL 3

54

33%

LEVEL 4

45

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

42

23%

LEVEL 3

70

38%

LEVEL 4

50

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

5

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

10

48%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

20

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

144
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

61

26%

LEVEL 3

90

38%

LEVEL 4

54

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

64

28%

LEVEL 3

88

38%

LEVEL 4

58

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

14

30%

LEVEL 2

16

35%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

16

23%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

24

35%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

79

27%

LEVEL 3

112

38%

LEVEL 4

76

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

90

28%

LEVEL 3

123

38%

LEVEL 4

95

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

26

72%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

23

64%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

188
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

83

26%

LEVEL 3

114

36%

LEVEL 4

74

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

220
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

32

9%

LEVEL 2

98

28%

LEVEL 3

124

35%

LEVEL 4

96

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

184
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

41

14%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

110

36%

LEVEL 4

74

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

210
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

89

27%

LEVEL 3

115

35%

LEVEL 4

95

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

9

31%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.