500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MARTHA BROWN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

335
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 740

LEVEL 1

100

14%

LEVEL 2

305

41%

LEVEL 3

205

28%

LEVEL 4

130

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

33

15%

LEVEL 2

77

34%

LEVEL 3

75

33%

LEVEL 4

39

17%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

181
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

142

39%

LEVEL 3

106

29%

LEVEL 4

75

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

39

38%

LEVEL 3

36

35%

LEVEL 4

16

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

154
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

57

15%

LEVEL 2

163

44%

LEVEL 3

99

26%

LEVEL 4

55

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

20

17%

LEVEL 2

38

32%

LEVEL 3

39

33%

LEVEL 4

23

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

8

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

303
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 647

LEVEL 1

77

12%

LEVEL 2

267

41%

LEVEL 3

188

29%

LEVEL 4

115

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

68

37%

LEVEL 4

35

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

16

33%

LEVEL 2

21

43%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

324
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 632

LEVEL 1

54

9%

LEVEL 2

254

40%

LEVEL 3

194

31%

LEVEL 4

130

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

72

36%

LEVEL 3

72

36%

LEVEL 4

37

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

46

43%

LEVEL 2

51

47%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

13

57%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

309
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 614

LEVEL 1

61

10%

LEVEL 2

244

40%

LEVEL 3

186

30%

LEVEL 4

123

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

69

38%

LEVEL 4

34

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

39

31%

LEVEL 2

61

48%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

16

37%

LEVEL 2

16

37%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.