500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PENN YAN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

108

28%

LEVEL 2

158

42%

LEVEL 3

77

20%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

122

37%

LEVEL 2

122

37%

LEVEL 3

59

18%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

41

24%

LEVEL 2

69

41%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

51

32%

LEVEL 2

61

38%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

67

32%

LEVEL 2

89

42%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

71

42%

LEVEL 2

61

36%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

100

28%

LEVEL 2

150

42%

LEVEL 3

70

20%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

105

35%

LEVEL 2

118

39%

LEVEL 3

53

18%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

9

64%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

72

22%

LEVEL 2

150

45%

LEVEL 3

73

22%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

76

28%

LEVEL 2

116

43%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

36

75%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

46

84%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

71

38%

LEVEL 3

54

29%

LEVEL 4

32

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

25

19%

LEVEL 2

52

39%

LEVEL 3

37

28%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

80

41%

LEVEL 2

87

45%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

97

50%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.