500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

NEW EXPLORATIONS SCI, TECH & MATH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

662
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 707

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

44

6%

LEVEL 3

222

31%

LEVEL 4

440

62%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

690
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 710

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

18

3%

LEVEL 3

192

27%

LEVEL 4

498

70%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

361
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

18

5%

LEVEL 3

95

25%

LEVEL 4

266

70%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

364
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

7

2%

LEVEL 3

88

24%

LEVEL 4

276

74%

MALE

PROFICIENT

301
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

26

8%

LEVEL 3

127

39%

LEVEL 4

174

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

326
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

11

3%

LEVEL 3

104

31%

LEVEL 4

222

66%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

30
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

13

43%

LEVEL 4

17

57%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

38
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

10

25%

LEVEL 4

28

70%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

4

80%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

211
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

2%

LEVEL 3

48

22%

LEVEL 4

163

76%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

225
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

3

1%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

181

79%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

331
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

20

6%

LEVEL 3

120

34%

LEVEL 4

211

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

336
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

2%

LEVEL 3

100

29%

LEVEL 4

236

69%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

40
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

19

36%

LEVEL 4

21

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

18

41%

LEVEL 4

24

55%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

20

38%

LEVEL 4

25

48%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

19

40%

LEVEL 4

25

52%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

585
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 617

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

31

5%

LEVEL 3

197

32%

LEVEL 4

388

63%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

604
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

15

2%

LEVEL 3

165

27%

LEVEL 4

439

71%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

13

14%

LEVEL 3

25

28%

LEVEL 4

52

58%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

3

3%

LEVEL 3

27

30%

LEVEL 4

59

66%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.