500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MANOR INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

117

23%

LEVEL 2

152

30%

LEVEL 3

155

30%

LEVEL 4

90

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

93

19%

LEVEL 2

143

29%

LEVEL 3

157

32%

LEVEL 4

103

21%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

58

23%

LEVEL 2

74

30%

LEVEL 3

82

33%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

48

20%

LEVEL 2

72

30%

LEVEL 3

77

32%

LEVEL 4

44

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

59

22%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

73

27%

LEVEL 4

57

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

139
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

45

18%

LEVEL 2

71

28%

LEVEL 3

80

31%

LEVEL 4

59

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

227
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

108

22%

LEVEL 2

147

30%

LEVEL 3

146

30%

LEVEL 4

81

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

246
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

85

18%

LEVEL 2

132

29%

LEVEL 3

153

33%

LEVEL 4

93

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

79

17%

LEVEL 2

144

31%

LEVEL 3

153

33%

LEVEL 4

88

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

56

13%

LEVEL 2

126

29%

LEVEL 3

152

35%

LEVEL 4

103

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

38

76%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

37

63%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

226
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

80

18%

LEVEL 2

138

31%

LEVEL 3

142

32%

LEVEL 4

84

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

247
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

60

14%

LEVEL 2

123

29%

LEVEL 3

149

35%

LEVEL 4

98

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

37

53%

LEVEL 2

14

20%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

33

50%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.