500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

HONEOYE FALLS-LIMA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

553
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,057

LEVEL 1

172

16%

LEVEL 2

332

31%

LEVEL 3

366

35%

LEVEL 4

187

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

345
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

109

17%

LEVEL 2

197

30%

LEVEL 3

243

37%

LEVEL 4

102

16%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

290
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

64

12%

LEVEL 2

160

31%

LEVEL 3

187

36%

LEVEL 4

103

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

190
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

37

12%

LEVEL 2

83

27%

LEVEL 3

125

40%

LEVEL 4

65

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

263
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

108

20%

LEVEL 2

172

32%

LEVEL 3

179

33%

LEVEL 4

84

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

155
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

72

21%

LEVEL 2

114

33%

LEVEL 3

118

35%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

5

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

516
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 983

LEVEL 1

157

16%

LEVEL 2

310

32%

LEVEL 3

346

35%

LEVEL 4

170

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

318
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

101

17%

LEVEL 2

179

30%

LEVEL 3

229

38%

LEVEL 4

89

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

6

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

540
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 927

LEVEL 1

81

9%

LEVEL 2

306

33%

LEVEL 3

356

38%

LEVEL 4

184

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

343
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 590

LEVEL 1

62

11%

LEVEL 2

185

31%

LEVEL 3

241

41%

LEVEL 4

102

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

91

70%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

47

77%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

519
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 924

LEVEL 1

120

13%

LEVEL 2

285

31%

LEVEL 3

341

37%

LEVEL 4

178

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

321
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

76

13%

LEVEL 2

173

30%

LEVEL 3

223

39%

LEVEL 4

98

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

52

39%

LEVEL 2

47

35%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

33

41%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

20

25%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.