500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

IROQUOIS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

244
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

34

9%

LEVEL 2

89

24%

LEVEL 3

124

34%

LEVEL 4

120

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

40

17%

LEVEL 3

79

34%

LEVEL 4

95

41%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

46

27%

LEVEL 3

62

36%

LEVEL 4

55

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

25

21%

LEVEL 3

39

33%

LEVEL 4

45

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

25

13%

LEVEL 2

43

22%

LEVEL 3

62

32%

LEVEL 4

65

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

15

13%

LEVEL 3

40

35%

LEVEL 4

50

43%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

196
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

64

23%

LEVEL 3

96

34%

LEVEL 4

100

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

140
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

27

15%

LEVEL 3

60

34%

LEVEL 4

80

45%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

9

31%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

9

28%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

81

24%

LEVEL 3

118

35%

LEVEL 4

117

34%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

32

15%

LEVEL 3

76

36%

LEVEL 4

94

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

9

35%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

206
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

68

23%

LEVEL 3

103

35%

LEVEL 4

103

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

27

15%

LEVEL 3

64

35%

LEVEL 4

83

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

16

21%

LEVEL 2

21

28%

LEVEL 3

21

28%

LEVEL 4

17

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.